The Family Who Raised Pet Lions (1970s CE)

It began in the summer of 1970 when Nina Berberov and her daughter Eva visited a zoo in Baku and discovered a sickly lion cub, that Eva initially mistook for a dying dog.

Family posing with pet lions, documentary photograph, 1970s
Date1970s CE
ArtistUknown
Place of originBaku, Azerbaijan
Material/TechniqueBlack and White Photography
DimensionsUnknown
Current locationWidespread
LicenceCC0
Description

The tragic story of the Berberov family and their pet lions reads like an impossible collision of domestic life and wild instinct. In 1970s Baku, an architect’s family took two lion cubs into their apartment and raised them inside the routines of ordinary urban life. What began as an extraordinary act of care soon turned into a story of fame, fascination, and ultimately devastating loss. The Berberovs’ experiment exposed the fragile boundary between affection and danger, and between the human desire to tame the wild and the animal reality that can never be fully domesticated.

A Soviet Family and an Unthinkable Household

The story began in the Soviet Union in the summer of 1970, when Nina Berberova and her daughter Eva visited a zoo in Baku and noticed a weak, sickly lion cub. With permission from the zoo director, the family brought the cub home to their 100-square-meter apartment. Lev Berberov, an architect whose surname strikingly echoed the Russian word for lion, joined Nina, Eva, and their son Roman in nursing the cub back to health. They named him King I. What might otherwise have remained a private oddity quickly became a public phenomenon. The authorities in Azerbaijan supported the unusual arrangement, and raw meat was reportedly delivered daily as part of the experiment in keeping the animal alive and healthy.

King I’s fame spread rapidly across the Soviet Union. The lion appeared in newspapers, television, and films, most famously The Unbelievable Adventures of Italians in Russia. Yet the story’s first great rupture came in 1973, when King I was shot by police after attacking a young man during filming in Leningrad. The family later received another lion, King II, from the Kazan Zoo, a gift made possible through the support of well-known Soviet cultural figures. But by then, what had once seemed eccentric and wondrous had already begun to darken.

Between Tenderness and Catastrophe

Part of what made the Berberov story so compelling was the extent to which the lions appeared to enter family life. King I was remembered as unusually gentle with the children. He slept in the family bed, tolerated rough play, and even formed a close bond with the family dog, Chap. These details gave the story a strange warmth, as though an impossible dream of harmony between human household and wild animal had, for a time, become real. The family’s daily life took on an almost folkloric quality, with a full-grown lion moving through domestic routines as if he were both pet and celebrity.

Yet that closeness always existed beside danger. After Lev Berberov died of a heart attack in 1978, King II became harder to manage. Unlike King I, he was remembered as more independent and more alert to hierarchy. In November 1980, after being agitated by a neighbor’s actions, King II attacked the family, killing fourteen-year-old Roman and severely injuring Nina. Police shot the lion in the apartment. With that, the story that had once fascinated the Soviet public became fixed as a tragedy.

Fame, Myth, and the Soviet Imagination

Within the cultural world of the Soviet Union, the Berberovs’ story was more than an odd domestic episode. It touched something larger in the Soviet imagination: the belief that discipline, courage, and willpower might overcome even nature itself. The family became symbols of an almost heroic intimacy with the wild, and their lions were transformed into media figures through film, photographs, and television appearances. The story carried both glamour and absurdity, as if everyday Soviet life had briefly opened into something exotic and mythic.

At the same time, the tragedy exposed the limits of that fantasy. King I could be cast as the grateful rescued animal, gentle and almost human in his attachments. King II came to represent the opposite truth: that the wild remains wild, however lovingly it is housed, fed, or named. In that sense, the Berberov story became a cautionary tale as much as a legend, and it continued to circulate long after the deaths of both lions as a warning about what happens when admiration, affection, and human confidence push too far against natural boundaries.

The Apartment, the Lions, and Their Afterlife

The family’s apartment was adapted in makeshift ways to accommodate the lions, including a fenced balcony enclosure that allowed the animals some access to open air. King I, who grew to around 240 kilograms, had lingering physical weakness from his early illness and required constant care. The family fed both lions raw meat, sometimes as part of the ordinary rhythm of meals and household life. King II, stronger and more physically robust, was also more demanding in terms of hierarchy and control, reportedly treating Lev as the dominant figure while he lived.

The story itself survives through interviews, photographs, film appearances, and later retellings. After the deaths of Lev, Roman, King I, and King II, Nina Berberova eventually rebuilt her life, but she never again kept wild animals. What remains is not a relic in the usual sense, but a narrative preserved in memory, media, and oral retelling: one of the strangest and saddest stories to emerge from Soviet domestic life, where tenderness and catastrophe lived for a time in the same room.

Object Products